US Federal Judge Dismisses Class-Action Lawsuit Against Atomic Wallet US Federal Judge Dismisses Class-Action Lawsuit Against Atomic Wallet A US federal judge has dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Atomic Wallet, citing ambiguity. The plaintiffs contended that Atomic Wallet had made its app available for download in Colorado and advertised on social media platforms such as …
US Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against Atomic Wallet

US Federal Judge Dismisses Class-Action Lawsuit Against Atomic Wallet
A US federal judge has dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Atomic Wallet, citing ambiguity. The plaintiffs contended that Atomic Wallet had made its app available for download in Colorado and advertised on social media platforms such as Twitter, thus establishing jurisdiction.
However, the judge ruled that the defendants did not have enough connections to Colorado to warrant the lawsuit being heard in the state. This ruling is a major setback for the plaintiffs who had been seeking compensation for their losses.
The lawsuit was filed in response to a ‘catastrophic’ hack that occurred in June of the same year, which saw hacked off users of Atomic Wallet with $100 million in cryptocurrency funds. The occurrence caused a stir in the cryptocurrency community, prompting calls for increased security measures to prevent future attacks.
Graham Dickinson, one of the plaintiffs, claimed that his frequent communication with Atomic Wallet’s customer service team from Colorado had established ties between the company and the state. The argument did not convince the judge, who deemed interactions of such nature insufficient to establish jurisdiction.
The company is expected to continue to face scrutiny from regulators and users as it works to enhance security measures to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. In a comparable move, the judge has granted the plaintiffs an additional 21 days to provide evidence against Ilia Brusov, one of the defendants, to demonstrate why they should not be dismissed.
This move implies that the legal dispute may not be fully resolved, and further developments are expected in the coming weeks and months.
The dismissal of the lawsuit serves as a reminder of how complex the laws regarding cryptocurrencies and blockchains are. The evolution of the industry is likely to result in more legal challenges and disagreements, testing the boundaries of existing laws and regulations.
MORE ON THIS TOPIC: To learn more about the legal and regulatory challenges facing cryptocurrency companies, check out this article on CoinSeeks.com: Cryptocurrency Laws and Regulations: A Guide to Navigating the Complex Landscape
Meanwhile, cryptocurrency users are left to wonder what the ruling will mean for the business as a whole. The case is not a legal precedent, but it does highlight the need for more uniform and consistent laws and regulations to protect cryptocurrency companies and users. As the cryptocurrency space grows and matures, it is clear that legal and regulatory frameworks will need to be adjusted to accommodate the unique challenges and risks associated with this new technology. Only time will tell.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Keep in touch with our news & offers
Thank you for subscribing to the newsletter.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.